Monday, 24 August 2015

South African historical facts

"The white man has a full and legal and historical claim to his part of this country, including land. And the black man who disputes that is welcome to bring evidence of the contrary. Remember, popular liberal myth, propagandist expressions and loud shouting and burning and looting to hide your own incapability is not evidence. It is barbarism."
[Take the time and read right to the end and then spread it far and wide.]

Knowing oneself and admitting to your own shortcomings is in all probability the most challenging aspect of being human. To those of us with the inherent incapability of doing so, it is so much easier to distance ourselves from our shortcomings and blame it upon something or someone which operates out of our own sphere of influence.
In the most pathetic case of projection, we even take off the identity of the entity which we blame. It becomes a scenario of: “They” told me … “People” says…and of course the very popular: “White people are…”

This is nothing new amongst nations. The absolutely dreadful situation of the German population after 1918 created a perfect environment for this. The nation lost it government, the promises of peace and prosperity at Versailles came to nothing, people lost their property, their jobs, their lives…they were unemployed, very very poor and with no hope. And somebody was to blame.
Now we should dispute the fact that the Jews of Europe had a thing or two to answer for, but Adolf Hitler managed to identify a minority of people who refused, for generations, to conform to German society and demonise them as the scapegoat. He used his “Mein Kampf” and his Nürmberg Laws and he made the Jews of Europe into a monster and he convinced the German people, and many others, that this monster had to be destroyed. Thabo Mbeki did exactly the same by branding the white person in this country as “settler”.
This is no different from what Black South Africa is doing to white South Africa. Through the hate filled propaganda of : “You stole our land! You made us into slaves! You keep us poor!” they demonise the white South African into some sort of monster.
Through legislation such as Black Economic Empowerment and Affirmative Action they effectively create a barrier blocking the white minority from active participation in the economic and social development of a country which the white man have inhabited, cultivated, developed and defended for 526 years, ever since Bartholomeus Dias planted his first padrao on the coastline of the southern tip of this continent.

Through portraying the white South African as a racist, inbred idiot walking around in khaki shorts and mistreating all and everybody around him, the white man in South Africa is made into a typical scapegoat for everything that is wrong.
The White South African, by developing and expanding his cultural heritage, his religious beliefs and his entire orientation did not conform to the standards of Africa.
He refused to accept the absolutism of chieftainship as a form of government, he refused polygamy on basis of religion, he refused to pray to the ancestors because he was a Christian, he refused to leave his social orientation of the individual being a building block of society behind in favour of the African belief that society defines the individual. In short, he refused to betray himself.

And in being what he was, the White South African developed a country of industry and agriculture and infrastructure. He turned South Africa into a country where the first heart transplant could happen, where enough food was produced to export it to other countries, where gold and diamonds were mined and wealth created. And this all happened in less than 200 years (between 1780 and 1980).
In the 3000 years since the end of the Stone Age, the indigenous people of Africa could not manage to create an infrastructure, could not mine or produce export, could, in fact not succeed in building anything higher than one storey and could not write down anything as reference for future generations, because they could not manage to master the art of writing. In fact, when the first Europeans arrived on 6 April 1652 it was 1974 years after Ptolemy I built the magnificent library of Alexandria – and in Southern Africa the indigenous people still could do no more than a few rock paintings and a clay pot with patterns on it.

Today, this development, this contribution of the descendants of Europe has become a threat to the Black South African. He cannot compare. He has no contribution that can remotely compare to what the white man created and therefore he has to fall back on what primal instinct tells him to do: Destroy that which is a threat to you!

It is against this background that the white South African is demonised as a slaver and murderer who stole land. Let us put this in perspective:
In the first place: The Europeans who came with Van Riebeeck had no intention to stay at the Cape. We can clearly determine this from the repeated application for transfer to Batavia or Amsterdam made by almost every Company servant. The few men who decided to make this their homeland, did so because they came to love the land.
They wanted to develop and grow here. And in the written evidence, left us by the men who did not intend to stay and therefore had no reason to lie, it is written down over and over again that the Europeans settled on uninhabited land. They exchanged land for cattle and money and traded with the nomadic indigenous people.
The Company decided to import slaves. I emphasize import, because no indigenous person in this country was ever put into slavery! In actual fact, the slaves who were brought in from Madagascar and Batavia and Ceylon and East Africa were the ancestors of an entirely new group of people: the Coloured nation of South Africa who adopted the customs and culture of the European.
Ever wondered why they did not adopt the custom of Africa?
Because they were not exposed to it, that is why! Nobody at the Cape ever set eyes on a black person for 130 years before the first Trekboere met the Xhosa in the Valleys of the Amatola around 1770! These slaves also added to the bloodline of the European settlers, as did the French Hugenots of 1688 and the British Settlers of 1820.

The White South African was a new nation, born in Africa. This nation called its language, Afrikaans, after Africa. This nation called itself after Africa – Afrikaners.
On the first of December 1834 slavery was abolished in the Cape Colony. This is two years before the start of the Great Trek. The white man in South Africa knew nothing of the existence of the Zulu, the Tswana, the Sotho, the Venda…and he was at war with the Xhosa. It is chronologically impossible that indigenous people could be held in slavery, if the so-called slave masters did not even know of their existence before the abolition of slavery.

Let us look at the “great” Shaka Zulu and the Zulu nation. Remember that the Europeans landed in South Africa in 1652. Shaka kaSenzaghakohona was born around 1787. He managed to unite, through force and murder and rampage a number of small tribes into the Zulu nation around 1819. Before that year, there WERE no Zulu people. A question of mathematics: The Zulu nation came into existence only 167 years after the arrival of Van Riebeeck. What logic can possibly argue that the Europeans took anything away from the Zulu-people?
So when did the black man establish himself in South Africa and how? The answer lies in the Mfecane: Mfecane (Zulu: [m?f?'k|a?ne],[note 1] crushing), also known by the Sesotho name Difaqane (scattering, forced dispersal or forced migration[1]) or Lifaqane, was a period of widespread chaos and warfare among indigenous ethnic communities in southern Africa during the period between 1815 and about 1840.

As King Shaka created the militaristic Zulu Kingdom in the territory between the Tugela River and Pongola River, his forces caused a wave of warfare and disruption to sweep to other peoples. This was the prelude of the Mfecane, which spread from there. The movement of peoples caused many tribes to try to dominate those in new territories, leading to widespread warfare; consolidation of other groups, such as the Matabele, the Mfengu and the Makololo; and the creation of states such as the modern Lesotho.
Mfecane is used primarily to refer to the period when Mzilikazi, a king of the Matabele, dominated the Transvaal. During his reign, roughly from 1826 to 1836, he ordered widespread killings and devastation to remove all opposition. He reorganised the territory to establish the new Ndebele order. The death toll has never been satisfactorily determined, but the whole region became nearly depopulated. Normal estimates for the death toll range from 1 million to 2 million.
The black man established himself in this barren land now known as South Africa a full 174 years AFTER the white man. How dare you then call me a settler when you are nothing more? If I don’t belong here, certainly neither do you.

Land stolen from the black man? No. The land occupied by the Boer-people was land that nobody lived on, for the pure and simple reason that the original people of South Africa were massacred and wiped out in a racist genocide by the ancestors of the current black population of South Africa. The very same thing that is now repeated with the white man. The white man has a full and legal and historical claim to his part of this country, including land. And the black man who disputes that is welcome to bring evidence of the contrary. Remember, popular liberal myth, propagandistic expressions and loud shouting and burning and looting to hide your own incapability is not evidence. It is barbarism.
The popular myth of “the end of colonialism” is a lie also. Colonialism in South Africa ended on 31 May 1961 when the country became a Republic. White minority rule was not colonialism, because the white South African belongs here – you cannot colonise your own country.
The entire uproar about white oppression and white guilt and white debt is based, exactly like the concept of the rainbow nation and its Africa-democracy, on one big lie. In Afrikaans, a language of Africa, we say: However swiftly the lie might travel, truth will catch up one day.
Black South Africa might as well realise that the time of the lie is running out. Your stereotyping of the white man and apartheid as the cause of everything, cannot hold much longer.
You cannot hide rotting meat under gift wrap for eternity.
Some time in the very near future you will have to own up and explain how you could hold a small minority of oppressed people responsible for the disaster that you have made of a country which has the potential of being a place of safety, a welcome and hospitable home, to all its children whether they be black, white, coloured on Indian.

The black man holds the key to the final destruction of what is left, or the final realisation that we have no other choice but to peacefully co-exist. The black South African can no longer avoid admitting that the destruction of the white South African necessarily means the destruction of everything and everyone left on the southern tip of Africa.
By Daniël Lötter
South Africa Today – South Africa News

Sunday, 8 February 2015

Jan van Riebeeck blamed for white settlers.

After president Jacob Zuma’s downright idiotic statement two weeks ago that all the problems in South Africa started with the arrival of Jan van Riebeeck in 1652, I have been noticing quite a number of Jan van Riebeeck profile pictures, cartoons and T-shirts going about. As could be expected – I would personally consider doing anything civilised to annoy Jacob Zuma as well.

But I think one should have one last word about this and then we can focus on the future again, instead of doing the ANC thing of dwelling in the past for ever. They have started with blaming apartheid for everything until they realised that some of us actually remember the years of apartheid and might not be as foolish as the majority of KFC-eating, my-vote-for-a-free-yellow-tee-shirt, snorting and dumping rubbish in the streets-voters are. So now he tried to blame a section of history which nobody can remember first hand. Europeans actually had the skill to write and record journals, and if the president bothered to read one or two from time to time, he might not make such a fool of himself. But I understand he said once that he is not one for reading much. That is very obvious, I fear.

The president passed standard 3 at school, I understand. Which explains his lack of knowledge, because the old standard 5 history text book was the one which taught us that Jan van Riebeeck was sent to the Cape to establish a halfway station for the trade ships of the DEIC (HOIK or Vereenigd Oost Indische Compagnie). There never was the intention of colonising or settling. 
Uncle Jan wanted to open a tuck shop, not take over the (non-existent) government! We know that all too well, because he sent out only a few expeditions to trade cattle with the Khoi-groups in the Peninsula and allowed the first free citizens to measure out small farms only after a lengthy correspondence with Amsterdam. He left the Cape after a decade, never to return and never to look back.
No, if Jacob Zuma wants to blame the first Dutch “settler” we must look at the arrival of the last Commander of the Cape who also became the first governor in 1679. This was the man who started building the strong sandstone fortifications of the Castle of Good Hope, who measured out farms, planted endless avenues of trees, started new enterprises, in particular viticulture, and within three weeks after his arrival visited all the outposts of the Cape. On the 3rd of November 1679 he arrived at a lovely spot nestled in the mountains by a river and decided to establish a “colony” of people there and to build a new town. This was a very clear indication that this man, Simon van der Stel, who named the new town, Stellenbosch, after himself, intended to stay and to create a new nation.
It is ever more obvious as he, after his retirement, never left the Cape but went to live on his farm, Groot Constantia, despite the fact that his children all returned to the Netherlands. He lived for another 14 years before peacefully passing on, loved and respected and known as “Father Simon” by the people of the Cape – black and white alike. Simon van der Stel, the first colonialist...
Now, before you decide that you had the wrong spirit exorcised and that Jan van Riebeeck was only a visitor while Simon van der Stel was the bad guy who brought the white man to this country: Here is a little challenge for you, mr Zuma.
We have no reliable portrait of Simon van der Stel, only a description which tells us that he was short and stocky with very dark hair, oriental eyes, small flat nose and a yellowish complection. And you know why that was? No, of course you don’t: In the records of the Dutch East India Company Simon van der Stel is described as “mestizo” – non-white. His mother was the daughter of captain Hendrick Lievens and a Batavian slave woman Mai Monica da Costa van Java.
You see, president Zuma, your first European coloniser wasn’t even a white man. In today’s South Africa he would be regarded as a Coloured person. So question is now: Are you going to exorcise the spirits of the ancestors of the Coloured people and tell them how unwelcome they are? Or of Indian South Africans whose ancestors originated from the same region as Simon van der Stel’s?

Mr Zuma, children should never play with matches, nor idiots toy with history....

Wednesday, 1 January 2014

Annual Top 10 Douchebags of the Year 2013

No 10:
The 10th spot was a toss-up between the security cluster ministers, that did all they could do to stonewall and prevent Nkandla from scrutiny and the Rapists of SA.
The rapists won due to the sheer revulsion of their acts.
Whilst not wanting to detract from the seriousness of the crimes. The politicians set examples with their words and actions. Were the professionals treated better and the various crime units not disbanded things might’ve been different. Appoint incompetent people and the incompetence will follow through the ranks to the lowest.
My thoughts and feelings towards rapists are not nice. I detest these vile creatures with passion. The hurt, psychological damage and pain they cause cannot be put into words. Should the death sentence be imposed on the rapists, I would be happy! There are no excuses for barbaric acts such as that, there is no logical reason for such acts.
Rape should be classified as a crime against humanity.
The governing party have a lot to answer for due to the example set and lack of morals.
Real MEN don’t rape!!!

No 9:
The 9th spot is allocated to another miserably, failed, thieving politician – Dina Pule. This ex-communication minister lied under oath, insulted the intelligence of South Africans, was deceitful, unremorseful of her actions.
She had her department pay for her boyfriend’s trips with her. She was ordered to repay the amount. She also

allowed her boyfriend to divert R6 million into his bank account from monies she coerced from businesses to fund a communication-indaba. Her boss fired her after a lengthy period of inaction – she was deployed as a MP

No 8:
In 8th place, and certainly not forgotten is the one and only – Mac “The Liar” Maharaj aka “His Masters Voice”
It is amazing to see this douchebag operate. He has been pretty busy this year, trying to explain the crap that his boss talks. The worst is that they insult our intelligence. We hear exactly what his boss says; He then needs to kill the proverbial verbal fires that his boss ignites by either blaming the press for “misquoting” or the people for not understanding his boss.
He has the ability to turn talking shyte into utter crap!

No 7:
The 7th place is allocated to a bullshitter of note that can put a politician to shame and exemplifies what a douchebag is.
None other than “prophet” Kobus van Rensburg!

This douchebag & his family screws people over using religion as a tool. They “pray” that the sick get healed; Crutches/wheelchairs etc. are hung up on the wall as examples (nice touch, hey?)
The gullible pay good money for this and the douchebags are not ashamed or afraid to ask.
In early Dec 2013, he dies of cancer.
Here’s the delicious irony for you – he could not “heal” himself. Just proves what a charlatan he was! The truly sick people that weren’t healed, were told that their faith is not strong enough.
Karma is bitch!!!
To top it all – his gullible followers “commanded” the “prophet” to rise up and live……obviously this did not happen.
A well-deserved 7th place for this idiot.

No 6:
This douchebag would’ve been placed higher, but was outperformed by better (worse?) douchebags.
In a well-deserved 6th place is Robert McBride aka “the Teflon Bomber”
Nothing, but nothing sticks to the Teflon Bomber at all. He must have a fairy godfather.
A CancER regime psychofant had this to say about him: ”He has served every deployment prior to ’94 with distinction and post ’94, he has proven his mettle as a disciplined, devoted and committed servant of the people of SA” Nogals a servant of the people of SA…laughable to say the least!

Please tell me the above is SHYTE or not.
The facts:-
- In ’99 he had an altercation with gangster Cyril Beeka in an escort agency (It never went to court)
- He was arrested and was in detention for 5 months in Mozambique for gun running (charges were dropped)
- In 2006 he was implicated in a drunk-driving, obstructing the course of justice charge whilst Ekhurhuleni Metro Police chief (charges were overturned on appeal)
- The bombing of Magoo’s and Why Not bar in ’86 killed 3 people and injured 69. (He was pardoned for this by the TRC)
This is the person that the CancER regime powers-that-be want to appoint as executive director of the Independent Police Investigative Directorate.
Go Figure!!!!!

No 5:
In the middle of this esteemed (notorious?) group of douchebags, we find the inimitable fat boy of the youth politics – Juliass “the Foolius” Malema.
This misinformed, pompous chappie thought he could outmaneuver his political boss. He was rudely woken from his grandiose dream.
He was living the capitalist dream- Houses, farm, cars, suits, cuisine, watches – Vivere In Bono Vitae
Then, he was ousted as leader of the Yoof Leeg.
Two entities entered the picture to further ruin his 2013 – SARS and the Hawks.
His life took a sudden nosedive! Despite living the capitalist dream and spewing forth unrealistic socialist drivel, his hangers-on could find no fault with him. He founded a political party because he seriously needed an income and politics is all that he knows.
This soapie has not run it’s series yet……
So, for 5th spot douchebag – I give you Foolius & his braindead EFF followers!!

No 4:
This spot is occupied by three douchebag brothers that have invaded SA in ’93 from the sub-continent to plunder and buy political favour. They are none other than the gross Gupta’s (Bros. Ajay, Atul & Rajesh). Incidentally, Sahara computers belongs to them……
The arrogant threesome demanded they be given diplomatic passports -“As they travel with zuma regularly”. It was denied (bit of a luck there, I suppose)!
They circumvented all security and landed at Waterkloof (probably with No 1’s knowledge) for a wedding and were escorted to Sun City by cops with blue lights. The sheer arrogance of this deed is beyond the pale.
They have close ties with the Zuma’s, as some of the Zuma family either work for them or are director/s in their business (from Gupta’s mouth to no 1’s ear).
I presume with Shabby Shaik not being in the position to help anymore, the village-idiot of Nkandla needed richer patrons (oops! Sorry! – business advisors).

No 3:
Another miserable creature masquerading as a servant of the people……
Her spokeswoman says: “These who know minister j-p, know her to be a people-orientated leader who consistently serves others (and herself –my words) and strives for the development….yadda yadda yadda. (If you believe this, you’ll believe anything!)
I give you Tina Joemat-Petterson aka Tina “Jouma”
This sorry excuse for a minister has a free-spending ability second to none. She thinks nothing to spend R420 000 in 28 days. Her hotel bill since 2009 is R1,6 mill.

She spent R151 000 on plane tickets for her children for a holiday in Sweden. She was found to act against the provisions of the ministerial handbook. Whether she has repaid the monies is not known.
This sorry excuse is not only free-spending, but cannot run her own department. The Public Protector has found her guilty of maladministration, improper and unethical conduct in a R800 mill tender award. And still she sits in her comfy position, serving at the behest of the arch-idiot.
Not only is her judgement suspect, she shows the arrogance of a typical CancER regime psychofant. She refused to enter a room or speak at the CT Press Club until an Opposition MP left. The talk was that the CT Press Club was “some kind of front, infiltrated by Opposition politicians”
Therefore she takes 3rd spot.

No 2:
This position is exclusively reserved for SANRAL aka “SCAMRAL/Nazir “Piepbalie” Alli/Vusi “Moeni Mouni” Mona et al.
In the 2nd place are the Highway Bandits!!!

What can be said that has not been said before…..
The concept: Ill-conceived, not well-thought out.
Communication: Complete balls-up- half-truths, utter lies from inception, obfuscation.
The implementation & admin: Half-assed, no logic, threats, and conflicting tariffs – it promises to become a logistical nightmare.
Economics: Makes no economic sense at all – An unmitigated disaster.

This singular event has united South Africans of all walks of life against an unjust, illegal, unpopular and immoral entity.

No 1:
It should come as no surprise that 1st place is taken by the “first citizen” of SA.
Jacob Gedleyihlekisa Zuma aka “the village-idiot of Nkandla”

The reasons are so numerous: Nkandlagate, Marikana-massacre, Limpopo text book fiasco, wrong appointments, failure to fire non-performers, his cultural gaffes (ie homosexuality, woman, business, religion, minority rights). It’s impossible to list all his failures, so numerous are they!
The CancER regime’s corrupt activities are illustrative of a deep, well set and fundamental disease called self-enrichment. This disease is happy to have a warm and welcoming home within the regime.
Congratulations Mr. President on your achievement!

*Source unknown

Tuesday, 2 October 2012

Miner strikes

I do realise that the 'coalface' miners don't have an easy job. Not to talk about dangerous. However, most of these guys are unschooled with minimum qualifications and not much in terms of responsibilities except to do exactly what they're instructed to do. Their wage demands (as far as I'm concerned) is way over the top.
They have no idea about the financial status of the mines nor the people responsible for operations. But typical of the average working class South African, they feel the pinch in the pocket when it comes to everyday life.

I worked for a major manufacturer in their field for many years. The company employed some 400 black workers who felt more at ease toy-toying than actually pulling together in order to safe the company when times got tough. The whiteys all stuck together - this was their sole income (just as it was for all the employees) - and even though business was bad, we were mostly prepared to do with less. Bring your own coffee, tea, sugar and milk. Work longer hours for the same pay. Do more than just your own job with staff leaving and not being replaced.
After more than thirty years in South Africa and with a proud history in the motoring business, the company finally closed it's doors. Not only did South Africa loose a unique and only manufacturer in it's industry, but 400 black workers lost there jobs. It's not even worth mentioning the 25 white, Indian and coloured staff who also ended up on the street with no income.

The revolution against apartheid years ago seemed to have taught our black population not much. The only thing it has accomplished was to create a revolutionary class of people who can only stand together in destroying what feeds them.

Wednesday, 25 July 2012


The folks who are getting free stuff, don't like the folks who are paying for the free stuff, because the folks who are paying for the free stuff can no longer afford to pay for both the free stuff and their own stuff.
The folks who are paying for the free stuff want the free stuff to stop, and the folks who are getting the free stuff want even more free stuff on top of the free stuff they are already getting!
Now... The people who are forcing the people to pay for the free stuff have told the people who are RECEIVING the free stuff, that the people who are PAYING for the free stuff, are being mean, prejudiced, and racist.
So... The people who are GETTING the free stuff have been convinced they need to hate the people who are paying for the free stuff by the people who are forcing some people to pay for their free stuff, and giving them the free stuff in the first place.
We have let the free stuff giving go on for so long that there are now more people getting free stuff than paying for the free stuff.
Now understand this: all great democracies have committed financial suicide somewhere between 200 and 250 years after being founded. The reason? The voters figured out they could vote themselves money from the treasury by electing people who promised to give them money from the treasury in exchange for electing them. Thomas Jefferson said it best: “Democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not”.
The number of people now getting free stuff outnumbers the people paying for the free stuff. We have one chance to change that at the next election will we?

Tuesday, 19 April 2011

The Ant & Grasshopper story


The ant works hard in the withering heat all summer long, building his house and laying up supplies for the winter.

The grasshopper thinks the ant is a fool and laughs and dances and plays the summer away.

Come winter, the ant is warm and well fed. The grasshopper has no food or shelter, so he dies out in the cold.

Be responsible for yourself!


The ant works hard in the withering heat all summer long, building his house and laying up supplies for the winter.

The grasshopper thinks the ant is a fool and laughs and dances and plays the summer away.

Come winter, the shivering grasshopper calls a press conference, demands to know why the ant should be allowed to be warm and well fed while others are cold and starving.

SABC1, 2 and 3 show up to provide pictures of the shivering grasshopper next to a video of the ant in his comfortable home with a table filled with food. The world is stunned by the sharp contrast.

How can this be, that in a country of such wealth, this poor grasshopper is allowed to suffer so?

Kermit the Frog appears on Good Morning with the grasshopper, and everybody cries when they sing, 'It's Not Easy Being Green.'

Demonstrations are held in front of the ant's house where the news stations film the group singing, 'We shall overcome.'

TV commentators explain that the ant has gotten rich off the back of the grasshopper, and there are calls for an immediate tax hike on the ant to make him pay his fair share.

Finally, the Government drafts the Economic Equity & Anti-Grasshopper Act retroactive to the beginning of the summer.
The ant is fined for failing to hire a proportionate number of green bugs and, having nothing left to pay his retroactive taxes, his home is confiscated by the government and handed to relatives of the grasshopper.

The grasshopper instigates a lawsuit against the ant, and the case is tried under the watchful eyes of the trade unions.

The ant loses the case.

The story ends as we see the grasshopper finishing up the last bits of the ant's food while the government house he is in, which just happens to be the ant's old house, crumbles around him because he doesn't maintain it. The ant has disappeared in the snow.

The grasshopper is found dead in a drug related incident and the house, now abandoned, is taken over by a gang of spiders who terrorize the once peaceful neighbourhood.


Be VERY careful how you vote in 2011!!